 |
HIV, STI and risk behaviors among men who have sex with men and female sex workers in El Salvador
J. Creswell1, M.E. Guardado1, J. Armero2, E. Monterroso3, G. Paz-Bailey1
1Collaboration Universidad del Valle de Guatemala and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guatemala, Guatemala, 2Ministry of Health, San Salvador, El Salvador, 3US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
Background: A behavioral and sexually transmitted infections (STI) surveillance survey was
completed in 2008 in El
Salvador. The survey objectives were
to estimate the prevalence of HIV, other STIs and risk behaviors among female
sex workers (FSW) and men who have sex with men (MSM) and to identify
interventions. Methods: We used audio computer assisted
interviews to survey MSM and FSW in three cities.
Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) was used to recruit participants. Blood was tested for HIV (Determine
and Oraquick) and syphilis (Rapid Plasma Reagin and Treponema
Pallidum Aglutination Particles). Data
was collected from March through September 2008 and was analyzed using RDSAT 6.01,
a program specifically designed to be used with RDS. Results: We enrolled 663 FSW participants and
624 MSM. The HIV prevalence was 5.7% (3.5-7.9) among FSW and 10.8% (7.4-14.7) among
MSM. Active syphilis prevalence was 6.3% (3.9-9.1) for FSW and 9.0% (5.2-13)
for MSM. Reported condom use by FSW during the last sexual encounter was 74.5% while
81.7% reported using a condom with the last frequent client and 90.3% with the
last new client. A total of 53.7% found clients in brothels or
nightclubs. For MSM, 46.1% self identified as gay or homosexual. About a third
(30.4%) reported a stable partner in the last 12 months, while only 34.6% reported
consistent condom use with that partner. Consistent condom use with female
partners was 4.9% during the last 12 months. Conclusions: Intervention strategies should include condom
promotion among MSM and FSW, expanding HIV counseling and testing services
and education programs on HIV transmission and prevention. To have a greater
impact, these interventions should be targeted at to MSM and FSW and not at the
general population.
Back -
Back to the Programme-at-a-Glance
|
|