 |
One-to-one risk reduction conversations: a mechanism to improve risk perception among Jamaica's men who have sex with men population
Presented by Sannia Sutherland (Jamaica).
S. Sutherland, L. Byfield, N. Cooper
Ministry of Health, National HIV/STI Programme, Kingston, Jamaica
Issues: Although the HIV prevalence among men who have
sex with men (MSM) in Jamaica
stands at 31.8%, the risk perception within the community is poor due to the
homophobic environment. As a direct result of the inability of organizations
working in the HIV arena to target this population openly and use prevailing
media to convey the heightened risk of anal sex in public fora, many MSM do not
see their risk behaviour as a greater cause for concern than other types of
penetrative sex. Description: The National HIV/STI
programme to increase the risk perception of MSM and impact on risk behaviour has launched a programme of one-to-one counseling sessions as
part of the MSM empowerment programme. Through the programme MSM
are placed in groups and over a 6 month period each individual is
required to attend a one-day workshop once a month where they receive VCT,
HIV/STI Education, Condom Skills, and Risk Assessment. Persons are also linked
into social programmes that provide remedial education, and skills building. Each
MSM is provided with one-to-one counseling opportunities with the workshop
facilitators to discuss their individual specific risk behaviours and their
life goals. Lessons learned: Due to homophopbia, Jamaica's MSM
have limited opportunities to discuss their individual sexual practices, and
this skews their risk perception because they deny and ignore the risk
behaviours for fear of repercussions. It is important to ensure that the group to be counseled are
introduced to the strategy beforehand as they are extremely cautious and suspicious
of new facilitators. Next steps: There is a need to increase the number of
opportunities to conduct the one-to-one risk conversations and it is proposed
that the number of sessions be moved from a minimum of one to a maximum of
three to gauge the improvement in risk perception.
Back to the session -
Back to the Programme-at-a-Glance
|
|